问题背景
升级应用程序 targetsdkversion 到8.0 后,发现下面这个问题:
在不升级前,APP退出,后台Service可以存活很长一段时间,但是在升级后,8.0以下版本手机还是可以存活一段很长时间,但是在8.0以上版本手机,app 在退出一分钟,后台Service就被杀死了。
杀死后有这么一条日志:
? ? ?Stopping service due to app idle: u0a309 -1m19s437ms xxx.xxx.xxx/xxx.xxxx.xxxx
原因分析
1: 拿到这个日志,当时的想法是,service 被stopping , 原因是:app 处于空闲了,结合Android中 Service是通过Ams(ActivityManagerService)管理的,下面我们来分析下AMS
2: 一顿分析下来:在AMS中有个函数 updateOomAdjLocked, 该函数有一个 sendMessage操作,代码如下 :可以看到如果 应用程序处于后台,且不在白名单中,会延迟发送一个消息,这个延时消息与常量?BACKGROUND_SETTLE_TIME有关,它就是Service在后台存活的时间,并且默认情况下是 60s
// UID is now in the background (and not on the temp whitelist). Was it
// previously in the foreground (or on the temp whitelist)?
if (!ActivityManager.isProcStateBackground(uidRec.setProcState)
|| uidRec.setWhitelist) {
uidRec.lastBackgroundTime = nowElapsed;
if (!mHandler.hasMessages(IDLE_UIDS_MSG)) {
// Note: the background settle time is in elapsed realtime, while
// the handler time base is uptime. All this means is that we may
// stop background uids later than we had intended, but that only
// happens because the device was sleeping so we are okay anyway.
mHandler.sendEmptyMessageDelayed(IDLE_UIDS_MSG,
mConstants.BACKGROUND_SETTLE_TIME);
}
}
public long BACKGROUND_SETTLE_TIME = DEFAULT_BACKGROUND_SETTLE_TIME;
// 存活时间常量
private static final long DEFAULT_BACKGROUND_SETTLE_TIME = 60*1000;
// 更新存活时间常量
private void updateConstants() {
final String setting = Settings.Global.getString(mResolver,
Settings.Global.ACTIVITY_MANAGER_CONSTANTS);
synchronized (mService) {
try {
mParser.setString(setting);
} catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
// Failed to parse the settings string, log this and move on
// with defaults.
Slog.e("ActivityManagerConstants", "Bad activity manager config settings", e);
}
MAX_CACHED_PROCESSES = mParser.getInt(KEY_MAX_CACHED_PROCESSES,
DEFAULT_MAX_CACHED_PROCESSES);
BACKGROUND_SETTLE_TIME = mParser.getLong(KEY_BACKGROUND_SETTLE_TIME,
DEFAULT_BACKGROUND_SETTLE_TIME);
...
}
}
3:这个常量是被 隐藏的,而且由于是全局,我们不能直接修改这个常量值,我们现在重点放在,BACKGROUND_SETTLE_TIME 这条消息的处理机制
? ? ? ? ?
final void idleUids() {
synchronized (this) {
final int N = mActiveUids.size();
if (N <= 0) {
return;
}
final long nowElapsed = SystemClock.elapsedRealtime();
final long maxBgTime = nowElapsed - mConstants.BACKGROUND_SETTLE_TIME;
long nextTime = 0;
if (mLocalPowerManager != null) {
mLocalPowerManager.startUidChanges();
}
for (int i=N-1; i>=0; i--) {
final UidRecord uidRec = mActiveUids.valueAt(i);
final long bgTime = uidRec.lastBackgroundTime;
if (bgTime > 0 && !uidRec.idle) {
if (bgTime <= maxBgTime) {
EventLogTags.writeAmUidIdle(uidRec.uid);
uidRec.idle = true;
uidRec.setIdle = true;
doStopUidLocked(uidRec.uid, uidRec);
} else {
if (nextTime == 0 || nextTime > bgTime) {
nextTime = bgTime;
}
}
}
}
if (mLocalPowerManager != null) {
mLocalPowerManager.finishUidChanges();
}
if (nextTime > 0) {
mHandler.removeMessages(IDLE_UIDS_MSG);
mHandler.sendEmptyMessageDelayed(IDLE_UIDS_MSG,
nextTime + mConstants.BACKGROUND_SETTLE_TIME - nowElapsed);
}
}
}
? ?化繁就简,抛去一些判断逻辑,我们具体看看停止服务实际是执行了 doStopUidLocked函数
final void doStopUidLocked(int uid, final UidRecord uidRec) {
mServices.stopInBackgroundLocked(uid);
enqueueUidChangeLocked(uidRec, uid, UidRecord.CHANGE_IDLE);
}
void stopInBackgroundLocked(int uid) {
// Stop all services associated with this uid due to it going to the background
// stopped state.
ServiceMap services = mServiceMap.get(UserHandle.getUserId(uid));
ArrayList<ServiceRecord> stopping = null;
if (services != null) {
for (int i=services.mServicesByName.size()-1; i>=0; i--) {
ServiceRecord service = services.mServicesByName.valueAt(i);
if (service.appInfo.uid == uid && service.startRequested) {
if (mAm.getAppStartModeLocked(service.appInfo.uid, service.packageName,
service.appInfo.targetSdkVersion, -1, false, false)
!= ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_NORMAL) {
if (stopping == null) {
stopping = new ArrayList<>();
}
String compName = service.name.flattenToShortString();
EventLogTags.writeAmStopIdleService(service.appInfo.uid, compName);
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(64);
sb.append("Stopping service due to app idle: ");
UserHandle.formatUid(sb, service.appInfo.uid);
sb.append(" ");
TimeUtils.formatDuration(service.createTime
- SystemClock.elapsedRealtime(), sb);
sb.append(" ");
sb.append(compName);
Slog.w(TAG, sb.toString());
stopping.add(service);
}
}
}
if (stopping != null) {
for (int i=stopping.size()-1; i>=0; i--) {
ServiceRecord service = stopping.get(i);
service.delayed = false;
services.ensureNotStartingBackgroundLocked(service);
stopServiceLocked(service);
}
}
}
}
?这里源码可以看到,首先遍历Service ,经过一些条件判断,将满足条件的 service放入到 stopping列表中,然后遍历这个列表,停止service .??
? ?这里我们得到了一个小结论:8.0及以上版本手机中有一个机制,app退出后一分钟后会清理后台service(满足条件的),但是foreground service不会。所以在8.0上可以通过foreground?service的形式提高存活。
从AMS分析,为什么targetsdkversion 8.0以上会杀死后台服务
? ? ?我们来看下 AMS中的 getAppStartModeLocked函数
int getAppStartModeLocked(int uid, String packageName, int packageTargetSdk,
int callingPid, boolean alwaysRestrict, boolean disabledOnly) {
UidRecord uidRec = mActiveUids.get(uid);
if (DEBUG_BACKGROUND_CHECK) Slog.d(TAG, "checkAllowBackground: uid=" + uid + " pkg="
+ packageName + " rec=" + uidRec + " always=" + alwaysRestrict + " idle="
+ (uidRec != null ? uidRec.idle : false));
if (uidRec == null || alwaysRestrict || uidRec.idle) {
boolean ephemeral;
if (uidRec == null) {
ephemeral = getPackageManagerInternalLocked().isPackageEphemeral(
UserHandle.getUserId(uid), packageName);
} else {
ephemeral = uidRec.ephemeral;
}
if (ephemeral) {
// We are hard-core about ephemeral apps not running in the background.
return ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_DISABLED;
} else {
if (disabledOnly) {
// The caller is only interested in whether app starts are completely
// disabled for the given package (that is, it is an instant app). So
// we don't need to go further, which is all just seeing if we should
// apply a "delayed" mode for a regular app.
return ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_NORMAL;
}
final int startMode = (alwaysRestrict)
? appRestrictedInBackgroundLocked(uid, packageName, packageTargetSdk)
: appServicesRestrictedInBackgroundLocked(uid, packageName,
packageTargetSdk);
if (DEBUG_BACKGROUND_CHECK) Slog.d(TAG, "checkAllowBackground: uid=" + uid
+ " pkg=" + packageName + " startMode=" + startMode
+ " onwhitelist=" + isOnDeviceIdleWhitelistLocked(uid));
if (startMode == ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_DELAYED) {
// This is an old app that has been forced into a "compatible as possible"
// mode of background check. To increase compatibility, we will allow other
// foreground apps to cause its services to start.
if (callingPid >= 0) {
ProcessRecord proc;
synchronized (mPidsSelfLocked) {
proc = mPidsSelfLocked.get(callingPid);
}
if (proc != null &&
!ActivityManager.isProcStateBackground(proc.curProcState)) {
// Whoever is instigating this is in the foreground, so we will allow it
// to go through.
return ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_NORMAL;
}
}
}
return startMode;
}
}
return ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_NORMAL;
}
?这里也有很多判断,我们看首先判断是不是ephemeral apps,短暂应用?这个我没有找到更多的文档,只有一篇说chrome团队开发一款无需下载直接使用的,也不确定就是这里这个。不过我们看注释可以看到,ephemeral apps是完全不允许后台运行的,所以我们的app一定不是ephemeral apps。(这里以后有机会我们再仔细调查一下)继续,disabledOnly在前面的调用可以看到这个参数是false;继续,alwaysRestrict同样参数是false,所以这样startMode就是函数appServicesRestrictedInBackgroundLocked的返回值,这个函数如下: ?
int appServicesRestrictedInBackgroundLocked(int uid, String packageName, int packageTargetSdk) {
// Persistent app?
if (mPackageManagerInt.isPackagePersistent(packageName)) {
if (DEBUG_BACKGROUND_CHECK) {
Slog.i(TAG, "App " + uid + "/" + packageName
+ " is persistent; not restricted in background");
}
return ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_NORMAL;
}
// Non-persistent but background whitelisted?
if (uidOnBackgroundWhitelist(uid)) {
if (DEBUG_BACKGROUND_CHECK) {
Slog.i(TAG, "App " + uid + "/" + packageName
+ " on background whitelist; not restricted in background");
}
return ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_NORMAL;
}
// Is this app on the battery whitelist?
if (isOnDeviceIdleWhitelistLocked(uid)) {
if (DEBUG_BACKGROUND_CHECK) {
Slog.i(TAG, "App " + uid + "/" + packageName
+ " on idle whitelist; not restricted in background");
}
return ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_NORMAL;
}
// None of the service-policy criteria apply, so we apply the common criteria
return appRestrictedInBackgroundLocked(uid, packageName, packageTargetSdk);
}
1:这里有三个判断,是否Persistent app;是否在允许后台运行白名单;是否在省电(耗电)白名单。我们看都是返回ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_NORMAL
2:回到开始的判断我们知道当不等于ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_NORMAL时,才会将service放入stopping列表,所以这三种情况都不会停掉service
看到这里我们就知道了,如果上面三个条件都不满足的化,该应用程序就会加入到 stopping列表
int appRestrictedInBackgroundLocked(int uid, String packageName, int packageTargetSdk) {
// Apps that target O+ are always subject to background check
if (packageTargetSdk >= Build.VERSION_CODES.O) {
if (DEBUG_BACKGROUND_CHECK) {
Slog.i(TAG, "App " + uid + "/" + packageName + " targets O+, restricted");
}
return ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_DELAYED_RIGID;
}
// ...and legacy apps get an AppOp check
int appop = mAppOpsService.noteOperation(AppOpsManager.OP_RUN_IN_BACKGROUND,
uid, packageName);
if (DEBUG_BACKGROUND_CHECK) {
Slog.i(TAG, "Legacy app " + uid + "/" + packageName + " bg appop " + appop);
}
switch (appop) {
case AppOpsManager.MODE_ALLOWED:
return ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_NORMAL;
case AppOpsManager.MODE_IGNORED:
return ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_DELAYED;
default:
return ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_DELAYED_RIGID;
}
}
1:终于看到我们寻找的了,第一段代码就可以看到当targetsdkversion大于等于Build.VERSION_CODES.O = 26,即8.0时,返回
ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_DELAYED_RIGID
2:当targetsdkversion小于26,会检查app是否有后台运行的权限AppOpsManager.OP_RUN_IN_BACKGROUND,如果有权限则返回ActivityManager.APP_START_MODE_NORMAL,则根据前面的判断不会停止服务。
如何采取措施避免在 targetsdkversion 8.0系统以上杀死后台服务
?那么我们从上面三个判断着手来规避这种情况
1:Persistent ?:实际上在Manifest中,我们可以为application设置android:persistent=”true”,但是前提是系统应用,也就是说我们第三方应用设置这个也没效果。关于Persistent app我们以后另开一篇文章细说。
2:是否允许后台允许:我们来看看 uidOnBackgroundWhitelist代码
private boolean uidOnBackgroundWhitelist(final int uid) {
final int appId = UserHandle.getAppId(uid);
final int[] whitelist = mBackgroundAppIdWhitelist;
final int N = whitelist.length;
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
if (appId == whitelist[i]) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
再来看看 mBackgroundAppIdWhitelist赋值,在backgroundWhitelistUid函数中:
第一行代码就明确表明了,只能系统应用使用这个方法,所以我们知道第三方应用无法使用这个白名单。
@Override
public void backgroundWhitelistUid(final int uid) {
if (Binder.getCallingUid() != Process.SYSTEM_UID) {
throw new SecurityException("Only the OS may call backgroundWhitelistUid()");
}
if (DEBUG_BACKGROUND_CHECK) {
Slog.i(TAG, "Adding uid " + uid + " to bg uid whitelist");
}
synchronized (this) {
final int N = mBackgroundAppIdWhitelist.length;
int[] newList = new int[N+1];
System.arraycopy(mBackgroundAppIdWhitelist, 0, newList, 0, N);
newList[N] = UserHandle.getAppId(uid);
mBackgroundAppIdWhitelist = newList;
}
}
总结
这样我们基本上弄清楚8.0上service的存活机制了,按顺序经历下面几个判断
1、是否后台service,如果是foreground service则不停,否则继续
2、是否在临时白名单中,如果是则不停,否则继续
3、是否是ephemeral apps,如果是则停,否则继续
4、是否是Persistent app,如果是则不停,否则继续
5、是否在允许后台运行白名单,在则不停,否则继续
6、是否在省电白名单,在则不停,否则继续
7、是否targetsdkversion大于等于26,是则停,否则继续
8、如果targetsdkversion小于26,是否有OP_RUN_IN_BACKGROUND权限,有则不停,否则停
而在8.0上,service的停止则有一分钟的延迟。
那么如果升级了targetsdkversion,怎么才能让后台service存活?
这里有几个条件不需要考虑了,如:
临时白名单用于调试;Persistent app需要系统app;后台运行白名单也需要系统app
那么剩下就是:开启前台服务,省电白名单了
修改方案
方案一:开启前台服务
开启前台Service, 会在通知栏显示 Notification
if (!CallingStateListener.isCallingStateListener()) {
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.O) {
startForegroundService(Intent(this, CallingStateListener::class.java))
} else {
startService(Intent(this, CallingStateListener::class.java))
}
}
//关闭监听电话状态服务
if (CallingStateListener.isCallingStateListener()) {
stopService(Intent(this, CallingStateListener::class.java))
}
class CallingStateListener : Service() {
private val TAG = "CallingStateListener"
private var phoneStateListener: PhoneStateListener? = null
private var telephonyManager: TelephonyManager? = null
private val notificationId = "callingChannelId"
private val notificationName = "callingChannelName"
override fun onCreate() {
super.onCreate()
initCallingStateListener()
val notificationManager =
getSystemService(Context.NOTIFICATION_SERVICE) as NotificationManager
//创建NotificationChannel
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.O) {
val channel = NotificationChannel(
notificationId,
notificationName,
NotificationManager.IMPORTANCE_HIGH
)
notificationManager.createNotificationChannel(channel)
}
startForeground(1, getNotification())
}
override fun onBind(intent: Intent?): IBinder? {
return null
}
private fun getNotification(): Notification {
val builder = Notification.Builder(this)
.setSmallIcon(R.mipmap.ic_launcher)
.setContentTitle("通话服务")
.setContentText("服务正在运行")
//设置Notification的ChannelID,否则不能正常显示
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.O) {
builder.setChannelId(notificationId)
}
return builder.build()
}
}
方案二:APP加入省电白名单
1: 首先使用:PowerManager.isIgnoringBatteryOptimizations判断是否有已经加入了
private boolean isIgnoringBatteryOptimizations(){
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.M) {
String packageName = getPackageName();
PowerManager pm = (PowerManager) getSystemService(Context.POWER_SERVICE);
return pm.isIgnoringBatteryOptimizations(packageName);
}
return false;
}
2:如果未加入,则需要通 Settings.ACTION_REQUEST_IGNORE_BATTERY_OPTIMIZATIONS拉起请求弹窗
private void gotoSettingIgnoringBatteryOptimizations() {
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.M) {
try {
Intent intent = new Intent();
String packageName = getPackageName();
intent.setAction(Settings.ACTION_REQUEST_IGNORE_BATTERY_OPTIMIZATIONS);
intent.setData(Uri.parse("package:" + packageName));
startActivityForResult(intent, REQUEST_IGNORE_BATTERY_CODE);
} catch (Exception e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
3:添加权限
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.REQUEST_IGNORE_BATTERY_OPTIMIZATIONS"/>
4:然后再 onActivityResult中处理结果
@Override
protected void onActivityResult(int requestCode, int resultCode, Intent data) {
super.onActivityResult(requestCode, resultCode, data);
if(resultCode == RESULT_OK){
if (requestCode == REQUEST_IGNORE_BATTERY_CODE) {
Log.d("Hello World!","开启省电模式成功");
}
}else if (resultCode == RESULT_CANCELED) {
if (requestCode == REQUEST_IGNORE_BATTERY_CODE) {
Toast.makeText(this, "请用户开启忽略电池优化~", Toast.LENGTH_LONG).show();
}
}
}
|